You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

200 lines
18 KiB

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html lang="en">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="ntm-xover.htm" />
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Author" content="Rod Elliott - Elliott Sound Products">
<meta name="description" content="Taking the Mystery Out of the Neville Thiele Method (NTM) Crossover Network">
<!-- Taking the Mystery Out of the Neville Thiele Method (NTM) Crossover Network -->
<meta name="keywords" content="neville thiele method, ntm, crossover, network, audio, diy, fi-fi, electronic">
<title>NTM Crossovers</title>
<link rel="StyleSheet" href="../esp.css" type="text/css" media="screen, print">
<link rel="shortcut icon" type="image/ico" href="favicon.ico">
<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<script>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({
google_ad_client: "ca-pub-1947877433449191",
enable_page_level_ads: true
});
</script>
<style>
#pgbtn {
display: none; position: fixed; bottom: 20px; right: 30px; z-index: 99; font-size: 12px;
border: none; outline: none; background-color: blue; color: white; cursor: pointer;
padding: 15px; border-radius: 4px; }
#pgbtn:hover { background-color: #555; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table style="width:100%"><tr><td><img src="esp.jpg" alt="ESP Logo" height="81" width="215">
<td align="right">
<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- 468x60, created 20/08/10 -->
<ins class="adsbygoogle"
style="display:inline-block;width:468px;height:60px"
data-ad-client="ca-pub-1947877433449191"
data-ad-slot="7119701939"></ins>
<script>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script>
</table>
<table style="width:100%" class="tblblue"><tr><td class="hdrl">&nbsp;Elliott Sound Products</td>
<td align="right" class="hdrr">NTM&trade; Crossovers&nbsp;</td></tr></table>
<h1>Neville Thiele Method (NTM <sup>&trade;</sup>) Crossovers</h1>
<div align="center" class="t_11">&copy; 2005, Rod Elliott (ESP)<br />
Page Created 13 September 2005<br />
Updated September 2020</div>
<!-- AddThis Button BEGIN -->
<div class="addthis_inline_share_toolbox"></div>
<!-- AddThis Button END -->
<hr />
<span class="imgswap"><a href="../index.html" style="display:block;"><img src="a1.gif" alt="Home"/><b class="bb">Main Index</b></a></span>
<span class="imgswap"><a href="../articles.htm" style="display:block;"><img src="a1.gif" alt="articles"/><b class="bb">Articles Index</b></a></span>
<hr /><b>Contents</b>
<ul>
<li><a href="ntm-xover.htm#p1">1.0 &nbsp; Introduction</a></li>
<li><a href="ntm-xover.htm#p2">2.0 &nbsp; Description</a><ul>
<li><a href="ntm-xover.htm#p21">2.1 &nbsp; Circuit Diagram</a></li>
<li><a href="ntm-xover.htm#p22">2.2 &nbsp; Circuit Explanation</a></ul></li>
<li><a href="ntm-xover.htm#p3">3.0 &nbsp; Conclusion</a></li>
<li><a href="ntm-xover.htm#ref">4.0 &nbsp; References</a></li>
</ul>
<hr><a id="p1"></a><b>1.0 - Introduction</b>
<p>The Neville Thiele Method<sup>&trade;</sup> (or simply NTM<sup>&trade;</sup>) crossover network has been described in AES papers and elsewhere, but there is scant information available to most of us about exactly what it is and how it works.&nbsp; There have been claims that it is anything from 48dB/octave to 100dB/octave, and that it may replace the Linkwitz-Riley crossover for general use.</p>
<p>What is not generally available is a description of the filter type, or any information about how it works.&nbsp; This article hopes to rectify that, and de-mystify the hype that inevitably builds up when something new and exciting is first introduced, but with little supporting data to allow an informed choice.</p>
<p>I must confess that I was mightily perplexed when I saw my first NTM crossover - it was claimed to be 100dB/octave, the published frequency response I saw first showed 24dB/octave, and the circuit had far too few opamps and caps to approach any conventional filter greater than 24dB/octave.&nbsp; There was no opportunity to try to analyse the circuit or run any tests, since it didn't belong to me, wasn't in my workshop, and I only had the opportunity to have a brief look inside the case.</p>
<p>It was only when I saw the real frequency response graph of an NTM crossover that the penny dropped, and I recognised that it was probably an elliptical filter.</p>
<p class="t_10">NTM<sup>&trade;</sup> and Neville Thiele Method<sup>&trade;</sup> are trademarks of Precision Audio Pty Ltd (2 Seismic Drv, Rowville VIC 3178, Australia)<br />
<b>For further information, licensing, etc., please contact Precision Audio Pty Ltd.</b></p>
<hr /><b><a id="p2"></a>2.0 - Description</b>
<p>The descriptions that one usually finds describe a filter network and a notch filter.&nbsp; These are combined to produce a filter with a greatly accelerated rolloff slope.&nbsp; Part of the description from a brochure by BSS audio [<a href="ntm-xover.htm#ref">1</a>] states the following ...
<blockquote class="t_11">
A Neville Thiele Method&trade; Crossover Filter (NTM&trade;) is a new type of electrical/acoustical filter offering significant performance advantages over all previous crossover
filter types in audio applications.
</blockquote>
<p>The article continues with a description of 'how it works' - while not actually giving any figures whatsoever - just the diagram referred to ...</p>
<blockquote class="t_11">
The NTM crossover uses a unique notched response to achieve a very steep roll-off rate outside the pass-band.&nbsp; The 4th order Thiele crossover amplitude response looks like the
diagram overleaf.&nbsp; You will see that notches in the responses speed-up the rate of roll-off.&nbsp; Beyond the notch, the response rises again, but remains respectably attenuated.
</blockquote>
I object (a bit) to the term 'unique' in the above.&nbsp; The filter type is described in 'The Active Filter Cookbook [<a href="ntm-xover.htm#ref">2</a>], and is commonly known as an elliptical or Cauer filter.&nbsp; There is no denying that this filter type is rather obscure (not too many will have heard of it), but it is neither new nor unique.&nbsp; It is however, an <i><u>extremely</u></i> clever application of an old technique, with some lateral thinking and necessary adaptation to maintain a <i>flat</i> summed response.&nbsp; Its use in a crossover network is certainly new, and the application is unique (if not the filter type itself).
<p>The frequency response is shown below, and this is an almost perfect match to that shown in the BSS brochure.&nbsp; The frequency and amplitude scales are different (from the BSS graph), but the response is virtually identical.&nbsp; For comparison, the response of a Linkwitz-Riley filter is also shown.&nbsp; Not shown is the summed response, which is completely flat for both filters.</p>
<p class="t-pic"><img src="ntm-freq.gif" alt="Fig 1" border="1"><br />Figure 1 - NTM and L-R Crossovers Compared</p>
<p>The NTM crossover response is shown in green (high pass) and red (low pass), while the L-R equivalent is in a yellowish colour (high pass) and blue (low pass).&nbsp; It is undeniable that at one octave either side of the 1kHz crossover frequency shown, the response is better than 60dB down from the nominal output level.&nbsp; Looking at the L-R filter by comparison, at the same frequency it is only 30dB down.&nbsp; Unfortunately, the response of an elliptical filter rises again after the notch - again readily visible.</p>
<p>About &frac12; an octave above and below each notch, response is back up to about -36dB (equal to the L-R), and beyond that performance is inferior to the Linkwitz-Riley implementation.&nbsp; Ultimate rolloff for a fourth order elliptical filter is 12dB/octave.&nbsp; None of this is shabby by any means, but it does show that some of the descriptions used in advertising literature are rather misleading once the full details are known.</p>
<p class="t-pic"><img src="ntm-phase.gif" alt="Fig 2" border="1"><br />Figure 2 - NTM and L-R Crossover Phase Response</p>
<p>There is not much phase difference between the two - they are (for all intents and purposes) the same in this respect.&nbsp; The red graph is the NTM filter, and the L-R is shown in green.&nbsp; Both filters have a 360 degree shift across the band, with the NTM filter being <i>very</i> slightly worse in this respect than the L-R filter.</p>
<p>In real terms, the difference is marginal only, and should not be audible.&nbsp; Despite the apparently radical phase shift, both drivers remain in phase with both filter types, and the phase shift in itself is normally inaudible (despite some claims to the contrary).&nbsp; While there are circumstances that can make phase shift audible, such a discussion is outside the scope of this article.</p>
<hr><b><a id="p21"></a>2.1 - The Circuit Diagram</b>
<p>Please note that the diagram shown below is taken directly from my simulation.&nbsp; It is not (and does not purport to be) the actual circuit of an NTM filter, but I strongly suspect that it will be rather similar.&nbsp; I have not seen the actual circuit, nor has it been traced from an actual working NTM crossover, so the 'real thing' could possibly be completely different.</p>
<p>The general principle of an elliptical filter is/should be pretty well known in engineering circles where filters are used extensively, and it consists of a conventional second order filter, followed by a second order state-variable filter.</p>
<p>The high pass and low pass outputs of each state-variable filter are summed to give the response shown above.&nbsp; The values shown are those used in the simulation.&nbsp; The hardest part of implementing a filter such as this is component 'sensitivity' - the requirement for close tolerance is increased compared to (say) a more conventional Linkwitz-Riley crossover network.</p>
<p class="t-pic"><img src="ntm-sch.gif" alt="Fig 3" border="1"><br />Figure 3 - Elliptical Filter Crossover Network Schematic</p>
<p>As you can see, the capacitor values are non-standard, but that was done to obtain a nominal 1kHz crossover frequency.&nbsp; This was selected because it is a defacto standard when showing general filter responses.&nbsp; It is not a useful crossover frequency for real use.&nbsp; Phase response is shown above, and is almost identical for both filters (NTM and L-R), and the ripple in the summed outputs is less than 0.2dB.</p>
<hr /><b><a id="p22"></a>2.2 - Circuit Explanation</b>
<p>The circuit itself is relatively conventional for this filter type, but there are some important variations and points that need some explanation.&nbsp; The first stage (around U1) is what is known as an 'equal component value' Sallen-Key filter.&nbsp; Unlike the standard circuit such as that shown in <a href="../project09.htm" target="_blank">P09</a>, the Q of the circuit is determined by the gain of the opamp, rather than the filter component values.&nbsp; This allows the circuit to use the same capacitor values as the next stage.</p>
<p>The second filter is a state variable type, using U2, 3 and 4.&nbsp; The filter frequency is set by R10, R11, C3 and C4, and the Q is adjusted by R6.&nbsp; The Q needs to be somewhat higher than for a standard filter, because the summing amplifier (U5) adds a selected amount of (out of phase) high pass to the low pass filter (and vice versa).&nbsp; This creates the notch, and R12 determines the notch frequency.</p>
<p>For such a complex filter, it is remarkably tolerant to component variations, but predictably less so than a fourth order L-R filter of the type used for Project 09.</p>
<p>In case you were wondering, the circuit shown will work, but the frequency determining components will have to be changed to get the frequencies needed rather than the 1kHz shown.&nbsp; In answer to the question (which <i>will</i> get asked at some stage) "How do I change the frequency?", the answer is that you will have to figure that out for yourself.&nbsp; This is not (and is definitely not intended to be) a construction project ... it is an explanation of how the circuit works.&nbsp; No more, no less.</p>
<hr /><b><a id="p3"></a>3.0 - Conclusion</b>
<p>This article has hopefully removed some of the mystery behind the NTM crossover network, and shows what can be achieved using some lateral thinking.&nbsp; The rise in amplitude beyond the notch is rather unfortunate, but at -35dB represents an effective power that is over 3,000 times (3,162 to be exact) less than the maximum applied.</p>
<p>This means that for an applied 100W input power to a loudspeaker driver (via the crossover of course), the worst case out-of-band power level (&gt; 1 octave) is only 31mW.&nbsp; This is further attenuated at a rate of 12dB/octave.&nbsp; At 3 octaves from the crossover frequency, (125Hz and 3kHz), the out-of-band power level is down by 48dB - 1.58mW for 100W input.&nbsp; This is insignificant.</p>
<p>By comparison, the L-R crossover is at -24dB one octave from crossover frequency (400mW), at two octaves it is at -48dB (as above - 1.58mW), and at three octaves it has an output of -72dB (6.3uW) - again, assuming 100W input power to the loudspeaker drivers.&nbsp; For all practical purposes, this is also insignificant.</p>
<p>The end result is that loudspeaker drivers can be pushed closer to their limits, because the out-of-band power is reduced.&nbsp; There is usually no good reason to push any driver that hard in a domestic system, but it can result in a useful improvement for high powered professional applications.</p>
<p>The greatest benefit is obtained at between &frac12; octave to 1 octave either side of the crossover frequency, with an improvement of around 10dB at the &frac12; octave frequency, increasing dramatically to the 1 octave point.&nbsp; This represents a significant improvement, but only where drivers are being pushed to their limits.&nbsp; In a domestic system, all drivers will (or <i>should</i>) generally have sufficient 'spare' bandwidth to be able to cope with the out-of-band power levels with no stress whatsoever.</p>
<p>Overall, the circuit is very impressive though - not so much because of the cunning application of elliptical filters, but more because of a complete re-think about the way such filters are normally designed and tuned.&nbsp; The Neville Thiele Method&trade; certainly delivers a very worthwhile improvement in overall crossover network performance.</p>
<blockquote>
<table style="width:100%"><tr><td valign="top"><img src="note.gif" alt="NOTE!"></td>
<td>Please note that the NTM crossover network is patented, so commercial use of the information presented here will infringe patent rights and may result in a law suit or other potentially
expensive unpleasantness.<br /><br />
Also, as pointed out above, the circuit shown is <b>not</b> taken from any literature, service manual, physical crossover or anywhere else.&nbsp; It is my interpretation of a circuit that
will achieve the same result as an NTM crossover produced by a licensed manufacturer.<br /><br />
Based on extensive searches, it would appear that this is the <u>first</u> published circuit (for general viewing) that achieves the results claimed for the NTM crossover network.&nbsp; This
page has been seen by Precision Audio, and a couple of minor changes made at their request.&nbsp; I have provided them with an undertaking that I will not (under <u>any</u> circumstances)
[my emphasis] provide tuning formulae or any additional information that would allow patent infringement.</td></tr>
</table>
</blockquote>
<p>Note that the patent for this network has expired in Australia, but is still active in the US and elsewhere worldwide (expected expiry date on or around 22 March 2021).&nbsp; However, to retain good faith it will not be published as a project, although I may add some more information here after the worldwide patents have expired.&nbsp; The schematic shown above is <i>not</i> the same as that used in the patent documents, and performance is not quite as good.&nbsp; However, it is still a workable circuit and performs as shown in the graphs.</p>
<hr /><b><a id="ref"></a>4.0 - References</b>
<ol>
<li>Neville Thiele Method&trade; Crossover Filters, BSS Audio, www.bss.co.uk</li>
<li>Active Filter Cookbook, Don Lancaster, ISBN 0-672-21168-8, Howard W Sams &amp; Co., Inc (1979 Edition)</li>
<li>Patents AU764595B2, US6854005, WO2001019132A1 (via Google patent search)
</ol>
<hr />
<center>&nbsp;
<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- 728x90 -->
<ins class="adsbygoogle"
style="display:inline-block;width:728px;height:90px"
data-ad-client="ca-pub-1947877433449191"
data-ad-slot="9701674198"></ins>
<script>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script>
</center>
<hr />
<span class="imgswap"><a href="../index.html" style="display:block;"><img src="a1.gif" alt="Home"/><b class="bb">Main Index</b></a></span>
<span class="imgswap"><a href="../articles.htm" style="display:block;"><img src="a1.gif" alt="articles"/><b class="bb">Articles Index</b></a></span>
<br />
<table class="tblblk" cellpadding="5">
<tr><td class="t-wht"><a id="copyright"></a><b>Copyright Notice.</b> This article, including but not limited to all text and diagrams, is the intellectual property of Rod Elliott, and is &copy; 2005.&nbsp; Reproduction or re-publication by any means whatsoever, whether electronic, mechanical or electro- mechanical, is strictly prohibited under International Copyright laws.&nbsp; The author (Rod Elliott) grants the reader the right to use this information for personal use only, and further allows that one (1) copy may be made for reference.&nbsp; Commercial use is prohibited without express written authorisation from Rod Elliott.</td>
</tr></table>
<div class="t-sml">Change Log:&nbsp; Page created and copyright &copy; 13 September 2005./ Updated September 2020 - added patent expiration info &amp; updated Figure 3.</div><br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-5cd8c929c555da1d"></script>
</body>
</html>